Episode 33 — Benchmark OT Security Progress: Baselines, Targets, and Evidence That Holds Up
This episode explains how to benchmark OT security progress in a way that executives can trust, operators can tolerate, and auditors can validate, because “we think we’re better” is not a defensible position after an incident. You’ll learn how to build a baseline that is measurable and repeatable, including asset coverage, segmentation reality, access pathways, logging visibility, and change control effectiveness, rather than vague statements about “improving security.” We then cover targets as staged outcomes that reflect operational constraints, so you can set goals like reducing unmanaged remote access, increasing monitored zones, or improving backup integrity checks without promising unrealistic timelines. Evidence is treated as a first-class deliverable, with examples of what actually holds up such as configuration snapshots, access reviews, control test results, incident exercises, and documented exceptions with approvals. The troubleshooting angle shows how benchmarking fails when metrics are gamed, when scope changes silently, or when evidence cannot be produced under pressure, and how to correct it with clear definitions, disciplined data collection, and consistent reporting cadence. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
